Imaging in EP
Imaging in EP Section Editor
Imaging in EP Deputy Editors
Imprisoning atrial fibrillation by constructing a wall of ice through surgical endocardial cryo-maze.
Sinus rhythm maintenance has been shown to be superior to rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) regarding not only symptom control but prognosis as well1. Surgical ablation is a valid and effective option superior to pharmacotherapy in achieving long-term rhythm control in patients requiring concomitant cardiac surgery2,3.
Herein we present the case of a 53-year-old female patient with a neglected large septum secundum defect that presented to our clinic with symptoms of deteriorating right heart failure, as well as long standing persistent AF. Surgical plan involved a thoracoscopic cryothermic biatrial Cox-Maze IV procedure, along with tricuspid annulus and atrial septal repair, as well as left atrial appendage exclusion. The patient provided written informed consent and International Review Board approved our hybrid surgical protocol.
Per hospital protocol regarding surgical and hybrid ablations, three-dimensional substrate electroanatomical mapping – 3D-EAM (Carto 3v.7, J&J, New Brunswick, NJ, U.S.A.) of both atria was acquired in the operating room immediately prior to the surgery and following successful cardioversion to sinus – patient was on amiodarone for the preceding month. Unexpectedly, voltage mapping revealed normal atrial substrate. Ablation lines involved are depicted in Figure 1 and involved (online video) lesions along the crista terminalis, at the base of both appendages, along the coronary sinus and the left isthmus, as well as the formation of a box lesion encompassing the posterior left atrial wall. An AtriClip PRO-V device (AtriCure, Mason, OH. U.S.A.) was used to occlude the left appendage, bovine pericardium was used to correct the interatrial septum defect, whilst the tricuspid annulus was plicated using a standard technique.
During the first two-and-a-half months of the blanking period, patient suffered a persistent left atrial tachycardia spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm. A repeat 3D-EAM procedure was performed in the context of standard hospital protocol to evaluate ablation lesion durability, as well as, in view of patient’s course, to potentially ablate the tachycardia circuit. Notably, persistent isolation of arrhythmogenic foci was evident since the (ablated) posterior atrium (posterior wall and pulmonary vein antra) was fibrillating while the septum and anterior wall were on sinus (Figure 2 – appendage was inaccessible postoperatively). Despite burst atrial pacing from sites on sinus rhythm, no arrhythmia was induced. Finally, on the right atrium, a line of block was detected along the crista terminalis lesion (Figure 3– dual-timed electrograms along the mapping catheter arms) along with superior vena cava isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus block.
Our case highlights the feasibility of combining 3D-EAM and thoracoscopic surgical AF ablation, while the observed spontaneous conversion to sinus is a testament to a lege artis procedure. Remapping the atria postoperatively, in a sequential hybrid approach, is advisable to ascertain effective lesion formation, as well as to assess/ablate any remaining arrhythmogenic substrate.

Box and ridge lines as well as right atrial appendage line as part of the thoracoscopic cryothermic biatrial Cox-Maze IV procedure

A pentaspline catheter is located at the fibrillating posterior wall proving persistent isolation of the posterior wall and the pulmonary vein antra was while the decapolar catheter inside the coronary sinus depicts sinus rhythm (LSPV = left superior pulmonary vein, LIPV = left inferior pulmonary vein, RSPV = right superior pulmonary vein, RIPV = right inferior pulmonary vein, CS = coronary sinus, ECG = electrocardiogram, AF = atrial fibrillation)

A line of block is detected along the crista terminalis lesion on the right atrium, based on the presence of dual-timed electrograms along the pentaspline mapping catheter arms (CS = coronary sinus, ECG = electrocardiogram).
Dimitrios Tsiachris1,2, Antonios Pitsis3, Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou1, Ioannis Doundoulakis1,2, Christodoulos Stefanadis1,4
1 Athens Heart Center, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
2 First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University, “Hippokration” Hospital, Athens, Greece
3Thessaloniki Heart Institute, European Interbalkan Medical Center, 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece.
4 Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
References
1. Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, et al. Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine 2020;383:1305-16.
2. McClure GR, Belley-Cote EP, Jaffer IH, Dvirnik N, An KR, Fortin G, Spence J, Healey J, Singal RK, Whitlock RP. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Europace. 2018;20(9):1442-1450.
3. Roberts HG, Wei LM, Dhamija A, Cook CC, Badhwar V. Robotic assisted cryothermic biatrial Cox-Maze. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2021;32:2879-83.
Conflict of interest: DT receive compensation for teaching purposes and proctoring from AF solutions, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Pfizer and Winmedica. AP receive compensation for teaching purposes and proctoring from Medtronic, Abbott, Atricure, Boston Scientific.